Home
- Details
- Written by Michael Z Williamson
28 Feb: near Nashville, at Oleg Volk's.
29 Feb: through Chattanooga and Atlanta, stopping in Tifton, GA.
1 Mar:  Through Jacksonville to Canaveral.
2 Mar: Early morning SpaceX launch, proceeding to Miami area.
3 Mar: Touring some USCG facilities, proceeding through swamp.
4 Mar: Signing books at Books at Park Place in St Petersburg, stopping in the Tampa area.
5 Mar: Tyndall Air Force Base.
6 Mar: Pensacola and hypothetically Mobile, AL.
I can meet up with people at actual stopping points--restaurants near my lodging, private homes, etc.  I can't make a lot of stops en route except for close friends.
Drop me an email, and I'm also creating a thread under this post on my official FB author page.
- Details
- Written by Michael Z Williamson
 
Bill's Politipalooza
Yesterday at 10:30 AM · 
There are very legitimate arguments against Medicare for All. I am against M4A and am very happy to explain why. However, new government expenses and taxes aren't really among the reasons. It's super hard to see a cancer patient holding a 6-figure bill and then complain about my taxes going up. It's super hard to see the $trillions spent on needless war and then complain about new government spending on its citizens. Lastly, when neither party gives a damn about debt and deficit, I simply cannot talk about the expense of M4A with a straight face. Fiscal sustainability is problematic with M4A, but it is a weak argument for most Americans given the current reality. I believe there are solutions far better than M4A, but let's debate them and stop thinking its a mic-drop moment when you ask to see the price tag. It's not!
~~~
Sure it is. I can hand you a million dollar bill for a dying kid every ten seconds. If you care about these people, you'll pay it, right?
Every person starts with a responsibility to themselves, their immediate family and friends, then their neighborhood, community, politic, and species in that order.
If you place the charity of random strangers above your own immediate circle, you are generous, but also a drain on on your own resources, and you will run out of them in short order.
Not every problem in the world is your problem or my problem. That is a harsh reality.
Is it reasonable to support your immediate circles? Yes, because you will gain similar benefit in response. Is it reasonable to offer some limited support further out, as available? Absolutely. Should you starve your own family to do so? Well, you can, but I won't.
Literally anyone can write a check to the Dept of Health and Human Services, or any other gov't agency, and it will be cashed. Demands for legislative force mean those people want SOMEONE ELSE to be made to donate, not themselves. You can find plenty of news stories about it, too. "I didn't think _my_ taxes would go up!" They voted for SOMEONE ELSE to get screwed out of resources.
If you go to the bank and say, "I need a loan for a new roof," you'll probably get it. The infrastructure helps your family and its economics. If you say, "I need to borrow $10,000 to give to some kid with cancer in Kansas," they're going to refuse, and they should. Taxes, especially deficits, should be going for critical societal needs such as infrastructure and defense. Charity is a luxury a wealthy nation can afford to a certain degree. The nation that mandates it as a non-discretionary entitlement, while considering infrastructure and defense to be discretionary, is on the slope to destruction.
Then there's the reality that the same government that spends $500 on hammers, denies painkillers to cancer patients, and negligently exposed at least 6000 veterans to HIV shouldn't be making ANY health care decisions.
- Details
- Written by Michael Z Williamson
www.MeWe.com if you report something.)
Does anyone think the above is not reasonable?
And yet, if someone were to explain that to the Cockzucker, using a ball bat until his cranial intestines leaked onto the sidewalk, rather than the public benefactor they actually would be, they'd be considered a criminal.
And thus, western civilization is doomed by "tolerant" "liberals" who can tolerate anything except dissent or humor.
- Details
- Written by Michael Z Williamson
Over here: https://www.facebook.com/groups/834976033333570/permalink/1511454445685722/
"Conservatives are still outraged over a same-sex kiss."
No, not really, liberal boy. Few of them ever were.
You beat us about the head with every "marginalized" group, in a universe where allegedly these things don't matter.
This is yet another reason why "liberals" should refrain from science fiction.  They really can't envision a universe outside their narrow little shell of hatred and prejudice.
Page 18 of 126
Either the character, having the memories of all previous hosts, is completely bisexual and relaxed about it. Or there's some hormonal/chemical factor in the host that makes them monosexual. Either way it should have been a nonissue as of the 3rd episode. It was you liberals who milked it for ad dollars.